RedskinsHeads

Sawxheads_Forum
May 19, 2012, 03:56:12 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Search Login  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Another WR rumor  (Read 391 times)
Mike Bass
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1718



View Profile
« on: March 12, 2008, 09:43:17 PM »

I do not think that this will ever happen because, IMO,  the Cardinals would not have re-signed Fitzgerald without wanting the combination of he and Bolden to stay together to form one of  if not THE  best receiver tandems in football ...but since the Redskins was mentioned as a possible destination that even the possibilty is something  to dream about.

http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
POSTED 10:30 p.m. EDT, March 11, 2008

ANQUAN BOLTIN'?

Now that the Cardinals have locked up receiver Larry Fitzgerald at a more affordable (or, as the case may be, less unaffordable) price over the next four seasons, they might have to deal with another thorny issue at the position.

According to Adam Schefter of NFL Network, Anquan Boldin could want more money and/or a trade in the wake of Fitzgerald's $10 million-per-year contract.

Per Schefter, some in the Cardinals organization actually regard Boldin as the better wideout.  But Boldin will make far, far less than Fitzgerald over the next three seasons -- he's due to earn base salaries of $2.5 million, $2.75 million, $3 million.

In our view, Fitzgerald and Boldin together is a luxury that the Cardinals don't need, especially with coach Ken Whisenhunt presumably trying to bring a Pittsburgh-style power running vibe to the desert.

Assuming that the Cardinals have a plan (which could be a dangerous assumption because we're talking about, you know, the Cardinals), the huge deal given to Fitzgerald should be regarded as evidence that they've opted to keep Fitzgerald over the long haul, and to get what they can for Boldin.

Throw in the fact that Boldin is represented by Drew Rosenhaus, and the stage is set for Boldin to start making noise about moving on.

Possible destinations are Philly, Dallas, and the Redskins.


« Last Edit: March 12, 2008, 11:28:12 PM by Mike Bass » Logged

CT-Skins-Fan
Full Member
***
Posts: 162


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2008, 12:22:16 AM »

The money thing could be a huge factor.  Given that they just gave Fitz a huge payday, I don't blame Boldin for wanting even money or wanting to walk.  The only thing is if we go after him (in a trade), how much would we be in the hole for?  I think we would pick up his current contract and would have to honor it or renegotiate.  I know there were a bunch of restructures to give cap room, but how much room is there to accommodate a big or even semi-big name WR?
Logged
Mike Bass
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1718



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2008, 01:13:40 AM »

The money thing could be a huge factor.  Given that they just gave Fitz a huge payday, I don't blame Boldin for wanting even money or wanting to walk.  The only thing is if we go after him (in a trade), how much would we be in the hole for?  I think we would pick up his current contract and would have to honor it or renegotiate.  I know there were a bunch of restructures to give cap room, but how much room is there to accommodate a big or even semi-big name WR?

I may have to dig it up the way that it works but I know that I have read somewhere that after Portis' restructure that it left us room for a big name signing while being able to accommodate our draft choices.
Logged

blitzfiftysix
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 233



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2008, 08:13:52 AM »

Alot of people think Boldin is a better WR than Fitzgerald.   Not sure myself, but they are both very good WR's. 
Logged
riggins44
Full Member
***
Posts: 216


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2008, 08:50:45 AM »

Boldin is a good receiver, but we don't need to break the bank or give up the farm.  This is suppose to be a deep WR draft which may hurt his bargining position.  Then again he is a proven talent.  Believe most teams may opt for a cheaper and younger player.
Logged
Bzapf
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 307



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 13, 2008, 03:43:13 PM »

Boldin is very good but I dont think he is worth what we would have to give up for him. They would probably want a skill player and high draft pick.
Logged

Hail!
#21
Mike Bass
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1718



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 13, 2008, 03:55:27 PM »

Boldin is very good but I dont think he is worth what we would have to give up for him. They would probably want a skill player and high draft pick.

Again welcome Bzapf and  I agree with you that we would have to ante up to get this guy. I think that even though they have James they could still use Betts (but so could we) and a second. But they would probably want another lower round draft pick too so no I do not think that I would make that deal.
Logged

riggins44
Full Member
***
Posts: 216


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 13, 2008, 04:27:35 PM »

What really concerns me is the effect it would have on team chemistry.  To give up Betts, picks, and give
Boldin a new contract could upset things in the locker room.  Right now I think we have a very stable and
sound locker room. 

The FO would need to weigh the risk versus reward to make a move for Boldin.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.3 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!